This one went viral a few years ago, without having any kind of reality attached to it. Here's the real story. |
They don't mean to be sheep. They haven't been trained to sniff out untruths. I don't have a lot of positives to say about my college experience, I learned some stuff, probably not worth the amount I invested, but one thing I did take away, is the ability to question everything. Some of my professors said such outlandish stuff, that I felt it was my duty to fact check them. And sometimes they were wrong. They never admitted to the class, or retracted their statements, because they had an agenda to push.
Everyone has an agenda. I have an agenda. If you haven't figured it out, you aren't reading hard enough. Most of my blogs are opinions and/or features. But the few times I've posted journalistic style articles, I've tried my damnest to present it in down the middle factual presentation. I was taught this in Journalism school. Tell the truth. Let the truth tell the story. But we've let agenda infiltrate our truth filters.
Every piece of information our friends "harmlessly" post on facebook, twitter, tumblr, reddit, blogs like mine, and even mainstream media like CNN, Fox, etc. have aspects that need to be questioned. Not like a conspiracist, but as a rational person.
Fine. Great. Dandy. Everyone likes a rebel rouser. And we like our guns. He will be popular in gun tote'n Linn County. As of my writing this article, his letter had been shared 18,000 times on facebook. It went viral. And plenty of people are happy he's standing up to our big bully government. Nothing in this letter is a lie. However, Mr. Mueller can't do any of the things he's hoping to not do.
Sheriff Mueller was not elected for his constitutional law interpretation skills. He was elected to serve and protect. Cops don't get the right to make up what is "moral" or "right" or "constitutionally sound" on the job. They enforce the laws. The courts decide who or what is legal, right, and constitutional. You can call Mr. Mueller a hero if you'd like, but he really has no right to NOT do what our government asks.
I'm not saying that what Mr. Mueller did was or is as historically ugly as Orval, I'm just saying that federal or state employees don't get to pick and choose which constitutional laws apply to them (as interpreted by the Supreme Court). And guys with little power, like a sheriff in tiny Linn Co. as opposed to the head of a state like Arkansas, really shouldn't be giving ultimatums to the government, unless they are ready to accept forced retirement.
As a teacher, I don't have the right to prosthelytize or pray in my classroom with students if I wanted. I can talk about God and/or state my opinion on religious matters, (which many teachers won't because they don't understand what their rights really are) but I can't defiantly try to convert kids in my classroom to my faith. It violates some church/state agreements I've linked here.
I think sometimes old people just want to yell "why am I mad!" |
Don't let the hair, the smile or the flakes fool you. Troy is not your friend on the football field. |
This letter by Mr. Mueller, is obviously politically charged. I wouldn't doubt that Mr. Mueller is gearing up to run for some office higher than sheriff (although he is close to retirement, and might be doing the "what the hell, I'm angry..." vent). This letter has charged up his base of responsible gun owners. Just don't expect your local sheriff or governor to do the same, because, well, it is a dumb move.
There are hundreds of laws I don't agree with 100%. Tweaks and outright rewrites are needed on many. The constitution is vague (fortunately). We can argue and bicker about what our founding father's intended. The courts can spend thousands of hours and dollars deciding what is right and wrong. But you and I, or a cop, a teacher, a professor--we can have opinions. We can't interpret and then enforce what we believe is our God given rights. Not unless we are willing to lose our jobs, go to jail, or spend a fortune crying to a therapist on how we were mistreated.
Fact check. We used to do it. Don't trust the source until you know it to be true. Otherwise, you're just being one of the sheeple you love to call others when they don't agree with your opinion.
So whats the difference in not enforcing these gun laws and not enforcing the federal marijauna laws?
ReplyDeleteGood question. It will be interesting to see how the Feds go after the big fish in Colo. and Washington, if there little pot parties get too big for their britches. Key difference now is that those are state laws, whereas Oregon has no state law as of now guaranteeing right to own assault rifles ( or whatever it is they are trying to limit, outlaw, etc.).
ReplyDeleteState rights vs. fed is a complex conversation I think is better suited for someone who studied political science. It never made a whole lot of sense to me.
Any politically charged human would find this article very politically charged. :) I'd hate to see Albany secede from the Union over this...
ReplyDeleteNow that Albany lost its I-5 stink, they are back on my top 15 Oregon cities list. I'd hate to lose them over, say, Woodburn.
DeleteRealistically, we could lose Texas over this, though. They've been itching to leave for some time.
Being a history major, and looking at primary sources, I can tell you, those letters exist...and are much worse than what you wrote. Thankfully, they aren't reprinted online, but forgotten in old newspapers and library archives, where their bigotry and hate speech is as forgotten as their gravestones.
ReplyDeleteTimes change, people eventually do as well. But does the constitution? Dun Dun Dun...
I'm always such a skeptic nowadays, and it sucks that there are so many lies out there on these social networks. One of my more "intelligent" friends on facebook just posted this coincidental comparison chart of Lincoln and Kennedy, and while the facts given were super cool, and I know my friend to be a smart person, I couldn't believe any of it. I want to believe, and I'm a super nerd, so this weekend I'll be doing some research on those two fellows to see if any of it was actually true.
ReplyDeleteI remember that comparison from the pre-internet days. It went "Xerox-viral." If I remember right, most of them were true (just very coincidental). I too should look it up and investigate it.
Delete